Skip to content

Building technical record

Boryslavska 54

Full address: Boryslavska Street, 54, Kyiv

Бориславська вул, 54

Technical condition: SatisfactoryKyivSolomyanskyi district

Key details from the building’s technical record.

District
Solomyanskyi
Construction year
1992
Floors
11
Ownership type
Municipal ownership
Building at Boryslavska 54

Building photographs

Source: directory archive

Photos 1 of 8

Swipe through photos or use the left and right arrow keys. Home and End open the first and last photo.

Things to check

Things worth checking before buying or renting, based on building data. Whether a particular problem exists here must be verified separately.

Condition and safety3

Structural condition

Check the timber beams

Prolonged leaks can cause beams to rot: the floor may sag or, with severe damage, collapse.

What to check and whom to ask
Data behind this check
  • Building record data: Floor structure material Reinforced concrete slabs on timber beamsThe building combines timber and concrete floor structures. Check which are above and below the apartment.
What to check
  • Have there been leaks? Has an engineer inspected the timber beams?

    Whom to ask: Building maintained by: ЖЕД - 905

Sources and explanations
Safety

Ask about fire protection for the beams

In a fire, timber beams can lose strength, creating a risk of floor collapse.

What to check and whom to ask
Data behind this check
  • Building record data: Floor structure material Reinforced concrete slabs on timber beamsThe building combines timber and concrete floor structures. Check which are above and below the apartment.
What to check
  • How are the beams protected against fire? Was this protection checked after renovations?

    Whom to ask: Engineer who inspects buildings

Sources and explanations
Maintenance and repairs

Check whether the basement floods

Flooding and persistent damp can damage basement structures and lead to additional repair costs.

What to check and whom to ask
Data behind this check
  • Building record data: Basement YesThe building has a basement. These data do not show whether it is dry or has had leaks.
What to check
  • Is there water or persistent damp in the basement? Has the cause of leaks been resolved?

    Whom to ask: Building maintained by: ЖЕД - 905

Sources and explanations

Comfort1

Comfort

Listen for creaking floors

Wooden floor components may creak when walked on and disturb rest.

What to check and whom to ask
Data behind this check
  • Building record data: Floor structure material Reinforced concrete slabs on timber beamsThe building combines timber and concrete floor structures. Check which are above and below the apartment.
What to check
  • Can you hear creaking in the apartment? Has the floor been repaired?

    Whom to ask: Estate agent or owner

Sources and explanations

Areas, apartments and building access.

Total area
6,827.9 m²
Apartment area
5,336.46 m²
Apartments
84
Entrances
2

Heating, hot water and building services.

Heating
Centralised
Hot water
From a separate boiler house
Gas supply
No
Electric cookers
Yes
Lifts
Yes · 4 units

Materials of the main structural elements.

Load-bearing walls
Brick
Floor structures
Reinforced concrete slabs on timber beams
Foundation
Reinforced concrete
Basement
Yes · 507.4 m²

Shared facilities near the building.

Playgrounds
1 units · Satisfactory

Organisations listed in municipal data.

Management organisations
  • ЖЕД - 905

Separate LUN details that do not replace the municipal building record.

Building type or series
No data
Construction year
1992
Floors
14
Wall technology
Brick construction
Heating
Centralised
Ceiling height
2.5 m
Apartments
No data
Accessibility
No data
Internet providers
  • Мережа Ланет — FTTB; up to 24 hours without electricity
Source page
View on LUN

Record origin and important usage limitations.

This record was compiled from a public building record page of Kyiv’s municipal housing management system.

A separate set of details and some photographs were obtained from LUN. Last import: 26 Aug 2026. Values from different sources are deliberately stored and displayed independently.

Date stated in the source: 3 Jun 2010. The data is historical and for reference; it does not guarantee the building’s actual condition today.